Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision.
نویسندگان
چکیده
UNLABELLED Although total knee arthroplasty is a very effective intervention and increasing in prevalence, failures do occur. We studied patients presenting for total knee arthroplasty revision to determine any modifiable causes of failure, both short and long term, and where future efforts should be directed to reduce the incidence of failure. A multicenter prospective observational cohort study of 318 consecutive patients, with minimum 1 year follow-up, undergoing total knee arthroplasty revision was performed. Associations between modes of failure were also assessed. The mean time from primary procedure to total knee arthroplasty revision was 7.9 years. Many patients (64.4%) had more than one cause of failure. Thirty-one percent of patients were early (< 2 years) failures at a mean of 11 months. These had a higher prevalence of infection, perioperative factors and comorbidities. Late failures occurred at a mean of 119.2 months. Other major causes of failure included instability (28.9%), wear (24.5%) and component loosening suggesting the importance of modifications in technique, implants and other areas. Application of these findings will ultimately reduce revision numbers through continued refinement of total knee arthroplasty practice and through further specific investigation of these modes of failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level II-2 (prospective study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
منابع مشابه
Outcome of revision in comparison with primary total knee arthroplasty in Iran
Abstract Background: In the recent decade, many primary total knee arthroplasties have been carried out in Iran and the number of revision cases is expected to rise with the aging population. The aim of this study was to report the outcome of revision surgery in the country and make a comparison between the outcome of revision and that of the primary arthroplasty. Methods: Retrospectivel...
متن کاملUnicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Modes of Failure and Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty
Despite the excellent success rates of the modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), results of knee replacement registries still shows a relatively high revision and failure rate for UKA, especially when compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Bearing dislocation continues to be advocated as the predominant mechanism of failure in mobile UKA, whereas polyethylene wear a...
متن کاملFailure of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In Norway, the proportion of revision knee arthroplasties increased from 6.9% in 1994 to 8.5% in 2011. However, there is limited information on the epidemiology and causes of subsequent failure of revision knee arthroplasty. We therefore studied survival rate and determined the modes of failure of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties. METHOD This study was based o...
متن کاملFailure of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with Revision to Another Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Background: While outcomes of primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) are generally favorable, resultsafter revision procedures are less reliable. This study examines the functional outcomes, complications, and implantsurvival in patients who underwent revision of aTSA to aTSA.Methods: Patients who underwent revision aTSA were identified from 2008-2015. Demographic, clinical, surgic...
متن کاملLoosening of Total Knee Arthroplasty after Brucellosis Infection: A Case Report
In this report we describe a 78-year-old man whose total knee arthroplasty showed the symptoms of infection with brucella with radiographic signs of loosening 5 years after the index surgery. The patient was treated successfully after a 2-stage revision arthroplasty surgery along with using rifampicin and doxycycline for 8 weeks.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Clinical orthopaedics and related research
دوره 446 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006